Content Removal
Persistent News Article Removed After 87 Days of Formal Pursuit
Individual · News article
87 days
To confirmed removal
4
Rounds of formal review
GONE
No longer in top 5 results
Search results
google.com · "individual name"
N
regionalnews.com › local › crime
Individual Name — [Article Headline from Regional Outlet]
The article covered events from several years prior with no follow-on reporting. It had been resisting informal removal requests and ranking in top 5 name results.
Auditing
Pursued
REMOVED
✕
Article removed
De-indexed · No longer in name search
Removal timeline
Engagement
Oct 18, 2024
Audit
Prior request reviewed independently
Pursued
4 rounds of formal escalation
Removed
Jan 13, 2025 · 87 days
Outcome
87 days
To confirmed removal
4 rounds
Of formal escalation
Gone
From name search results
The publication had already declined an informal removal request before engagement. Grounds were reassessed independently and formal documentation prepared. Four rounds of escalation over 87 days resulted in confirmed removal. The article URL now returns a 404 and has been de-indexed from Google.
The Situation
- An individual came to us with a news article that had already resisted informal removal attempts — they had contacted the publication directly and been told the article would not be removed
- The article covered a matter the individual disputed both in its accuracy and its continued relevance; the underlying events had occurred years prior with no follow-on developments
- The article was appearing consistently in the top 5 results for their name search
- The client needed a formal, documented approach that could succeed where an informal request had already failed
The Challenge
- When a publication has already declined an informal removal request, you are not making a first approach — you are restarting a conversation the publication has already formed a position on
- The path forward requires different framing: formal documentation, a legal and editorial basis that goes beyond a general request, and a process the publication’s decision-makers can follow without feeling pressured
- This particular outlet had a history of holding older content and required sustained engagement over multiple rounds before a final decision was reached
- The 87-day timeline reflects that process, not a delay on our part
What We Did
- Engagement handled by our news article removal service, with sustained editorial pursuit across four review rounds.
- Assessed the article’s removal grounds independently of the prior informal request — identifying the legal and editorial basis that had not been presented in the initial contact
- Prepared a formal removal request that addressed accuracy, relevance, and the ongoing harm of continued publication
- Submitted and maintained follow-through across 4 rounds of review over 87 days
- Confirmed removal from the publication and subsequent de-indexing from Google
Article removed after 87 days of formal pursuit. De-indexed from Google following removal.
- Article removed from the publication after 87 days of formal pursuit
- De-indexed from Google following removal confirmation
- No longer appears in name search results on page 1, 2, or 3
- Article confirmed removed after sustained formal pursuit — no longer indexed in Google search
Article removed in 87 days · Engagement started October 18, 2024
Client information in all case studies has been redacted to protect the privacy and confidentiality of individuals and businesses. All cases are real engagements completed by Erase.com’s content removal services. If you have specific questions about our approach or results, contact one of our reputation specialists.