Content Removal
Court Records Removed and De-Indexed in 1 Day
Individual · 4 court records
2
Court records cleared
1 day
To confirmed removal
GONE
Records no longer in search results
Search results
google.com · "individual name"
C
courtrecords.publicdata.com › case-search
Individual Name — Public Court Case Filing Record
Case type · Filing date · Court jurisdiction. Record aggregated from public court database.
Auditing
Submitted
CLEARED
C
courtrecords.publicdata.com › case-search
Individual Name — Court Case Record, Second Filing
Case type · Filing date · Court jurisdiction. Record aggregated from public court database.
Auditing
Submitted
CLEARED
✕
Both records cleared
1 removed · 1 de-indexed
Removal timeline
Engagement
Jan 8, 2025
Audit
Both records identified
Submitted
Parallel requests filed
Cleared
Jan 9, 2025 · 1 day
Outcome
2 of 2
Records cleared
1 day
To confirmed clearance
Gone
From name search results
Two court records on a public aggregator were appearing in name search results. Removal pathways were verified and formal requests submitted in parallel. One record removed from the source platform, one de-indexed from Google. Both cleared within 1 day of engagement.
The Situation
- An individual had 2 court records that had been indexed from a public court record aggregator site and were appearing in name search results
- The records contained case information that no longer accurately reflected the individual’s current circumstances
- Court records, once indexed by Google, can surface for years after a case closes — particularly when published on aggregator platforms designed to rank for name searches
The Challenge
- Same-day clearance requires both the correct submission format and a relationship with the platform’s expedited review channel — the pathway our court record removal service uses when timelines are compressed.
- Public court record databases rank aggressively for personal name searches — they are built to surface this type of content
- Unlike news articles, which at least provide narrative context, court record pages often display raw case details — charge categories, filing dates, and case numbers — without any context about outcome or resolution
- For job applicants, a court record listing in a name search can preempt an interview before the applicant has any chance to explain the circumstances
What We Did
- Identified the court record aggregator site hosting both records
- Identified the applicable removal pathway and submitted formal removal requests for both records simultaneously
- Requested expedited processing given the nature of the records and the client’s timeline
- Confirmed removal and de-indexing of both records within 1 day of engagement
Both court records removed and de-indexed in 1 day.
- Both court records removed from the aggregator site within 1 day
- Records de-indexed from Google search results following removal
- Court record information no longer accessible through the affected platform
- Records confirmed removed and de-indexed — no longer accessible through the platform or Google search
Both records removed and de-indexed in 1 day · Engagement started January 8, 2025
Client information in all case studies has been redacted to protect the privacy and confidentiality of individuals and businesses. All cases are real engagements completed by Erase.com’s online content removal service. If you have specific questions about our approach or results, contact one of our reputation specialists.